History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Savage
54 N.Y.2d 697
| NY | 1981
|
Check Treatment

*698OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate- Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s plea of guilty operated as a waiver of his claim that he was entitled to have the indictment dismissed on the ground that the People were not ready for trial within the time prescribed by CPL 30.30 (People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845). Accordingly, we have no occasion to consider the merits of this statutory “speedy trial” claim in the instant appeal. As to defendant’s claim that his conviction should be reversed because he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, although this claim was not waived by his plea, we note only that defendant has not demonstrated a factual or legal basis for the claim (see People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442) and that, consequently, he is not entitled to the relief he seeks.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Savage
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 6, 1981
Citation: 54 N.Y.2d 697
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.