The findings of fact in this case are fully sustained by the evidence, and the conclusions of law are such as the findings of fact warrant. That the defendant has broken ids covenants is abundantly proved, is plain; .while the violations of covenant claimed to have been done by the plaintiff *115are too trivial to require pptice. The case is so plain, in the facts and principles involved, that no discussion seems to be required. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.