History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bellamy v. New York City Police Department
20 N.Y.3d 1028
| NY | 2013
|
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. In denying the subject Freedom of Information Law request, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.

Case Details

Case Name: Bellamy v. New York City Police Department
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 12, 2013
Citation: 20 N.Y.3d 1028
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.