History
  • No items yet
midpage
Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Pokrass
274 A.D. 1054
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1949
|
Check Treatment

Order of November 16,1948, denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars and for leave to serve a bill of particulars only after an examination of the defendants, is modified so as to strike out from items 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10 and 12 the words " each and every act ” and substitute “ the acts ”; and to strike out from item 6 “ each and every improper, illegal and fraudulent act” and substitute “the improper and fraudulent acts.” Plaintiff,, within the limits of the order as modified, should furnish the bill of particulars directed herein before plaintiff’s examination of defendants before trial directed in the companion appeal (ante, p. 1053). Special Term protected plaintiff by providing that if plaintiff does not have any of the information requested it may so state but must furnish the same within ten days after completion of plaintiff’s examination'of defendants before trial; to this we add the provision that plaintiff must so furnish the bill unless excused by order on motion to preclude. As so modified, the order appealed from is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Pokrass
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 31, 1949
Citation: 274 A.D. 1054
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.