History
  • No items yet
midpage
Otto v. Otto
265 A.D. 1037
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1943
|
Check Treatment

All concur, except Harris, J., not voting. (The order directs defendant to pay ten dollars per week until plaintiff’s judgment against defendant is fully satisfied; the second order *1038denies defendant’s motion to modify the previous order.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Otto v. Otto
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 27, 1943
Citation: 265 A.D. 1037
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.