History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. McCorkle
254 A.D. 632
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1938
|
Check Treatment

Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We believe the allegations contained in the portions of defendant McCorlde’s answer remaining after the excision of the “ third defense and counterclaim ” are sufficient to test his right to the relief which his pleading demands. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from grants plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim and to strike out certain defenses in defendant’s answer, in an action to compel specific performance.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. McCorkle
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 9, 1938
Citation: 254 A.D. 632
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.