History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank
246 A.D. 573
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

Order, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike out the first, second, third, fourth and fifth defenses contained in the amended answer of defendants-appellants, on the ground of insufficiency, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the first and third defenses in the amended answer of said defendants and votes to reverse the order appealed from in so far as the same strikes out said defenses, and to deny the motion to strike out said defenses.

Case Details

Case Name: Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1935
Citation: 246 A.D. 573
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.