Plaintiff has appealed from an order opening defendant’s default. The proof shows that the Special Term was warranted in making the order appealed from and that it was a proper exercise of discretion, and the order should, therefore, be affirmed. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
