History
  • No items yet
midpage
Emanuel v. Brower
243 A.D. 722
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

Order of the County Court of Nassau county granting motion for reargument, and on reargument *723denying defendant’s motion to vacate the prior order and to direct, pursuant to rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the service of a second amended complaint, reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs; the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order herein. There was an improper joinder of causes of action. (DeWolfe v. Abraham, 151 N. Y. 186, 189; Civ. Prac. Act, § 258.) “It does not follow that two causes of action, originating at the same time, arose as a matter of law out of the same transaction, or are proved by the same evidence. (Anderson v. Hill, 53 Barb. 245, 246.)” Appeal from order entered November 20, 1934, dismissed. The order on the motion for reargument supersedes the order on the first motion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Emanuel v. Brower
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1935
Citation: 243 A.D. 722
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.