History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schulman v. Riga
243 A.D. 586
N.Y. App. Div.
1935
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence and is probably accounted for by the many references of plaintiff’s counsel to extraneous matters.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Case Details

Case Name: Schulman v. Riga
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1935
Citation: 243 A.D. 586
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.