History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Robins
243 A.D. 548
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

The executor and executrix nominated in the will of the testator appeal from the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county settling their account upon the ground that they are entitled to full commissions in each of their capacities as executors and trustees. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable out of the estate. In our judgment the duties imposed upon the trustees were concurrent or coexistent with their duties as executors and, therefore, they are not entitled at this time to one-half commissions for paying out principal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Cars-well, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Robins
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1934
Citation: 243 A.D. 548
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.