History
  • No items yet
midpage
Noe v. Wolf
243 A.D. 542
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiffs’ intestate through the negligence, as alleged, of defendant in the use and administration of an anaesthetic. Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. In our opinion, plaintiffs made out a prima facie ease and were entitled to have the court submit to the jury the question of defendant’s negligence in permitting chloroform to be used as the anaesthetic and in directing the anaesthetist in the “ pouring ” of the chloroform. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Noe v. Wolf
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1934
Citation: 243 A.D. 542
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.