History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden
243 A.D. 82
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden (243 App. Div. 81), decided herewith, the order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Finch, P. J., dissents and votes for modification.






Dissenting Opinion

Finch, P. J.

(dissenting in part). For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Bert Amusement Corp. v. Holmden (243 App. Div. 81), decided herewith, the order appealed from should be modified by permitting peaceful picketing by at least two pickets and an immediate trial should be had of the action, and as so modified affirmed.

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: Rosekay Amusement Corp. v. Holmden
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 24, 1934
Citation: 243 A.D. 82
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.