History
  • No items yet
midpage
Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam
242 A.D. 893
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff moved for an order striking out a separate defense in the answer, and also for summary judgment. Order denying motion is affirmed. The record does not disclose upon what theory the former action was disposed of. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1934
Citation: 242 A.D. 893
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.