History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Featherly
275 N.Y.S. 256
N.Y. App. Div.
1934
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The County Court may not, on motion, set aside a voidable judgment of the City Court. The remedy was by appeal. (Mantha Co., Inc., v. Pirseh & Sons Co., 222 App. Div. 440; Handshaw v. Arthur, 9 id. 175; affd,, 161 N. Y. 664; East Syracuse Motor Car Co. v. Tuttle, 230 App. Div, 872.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Featherly
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1934
Citation: 275 N.Y.S. 256
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.