History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Featherly
275 N.Y.S. 256
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The County Court may not, on motion, set aside a voidable judgment of the City Court. The remedy was by appeal. (Mantha Co., Inc., v. Pirseh & Sons Co., 222 App. Div. 440; Handshaw v. Arthur, 9 id. 175; affd,, 161 N. Y. 664; East Syracuse Motor Car Co. v. Tuttle, 230 App. Div, 872.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Featherly
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1934
Citation: 275 N.Y.S. 256
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.