Hall v. New York Telephone Co.
242 A.D. 880
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1934|
Check Treatment— Judgment affirmed, with costs.. Rhodes, McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Heffeman, J., dissent. (Tremblay v. Harmony Mills, 171 N. Y. 598; Crounse v. Sager, 224 App. Div. 10; Hughes v. Borden’s Farm Products Co., Inc., 252 N. Y. 532; Keegan v. Hohorst, 261 id. 566.)