Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the admission of the indorsement upon plaintiff’s Exhibit 8 was error, we are of the opinion that in view of the other evidence it was not prejudicial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for affirmance, being of the opinion that the entry in the government records was admissible in evidence under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
