Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff came to the building on a personal errand in no way connected with the business of the defendant and was at best a bare licensee to whom the defendant owed no duty of active care. (Poock v. Strahl, 237 App. Div. 842.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, .Carswell and Davis, JJ.