History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n
240 A.D. 834
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

The record indicates that respondent willfully delayed the proceeding. However, it appears that he has not answered or explained the charges against him, some of which are very serious. Despite Ms conduct on the hearings, he will be given another opportunity to testify in Ms own behalf. The proceeding will be reopened and hearing had before the presiding justice at Ms chambers on October sixteenth at ten a. m. *835The petitioner will be permitted, if it so desire, to present any further proof. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1933
Citation: 240 A.D. 834
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.