History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hewitt v. Silent Automatic Sales Corp.
238 A.D. 805
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Order of the County Court of Westchester county reversing judgment of the City Court of New Rochelle and granting judgment for plaintiff, and judgment of the City Court of New Rochelle entered thereon, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered in the City Court of New Rochelle, costs to abide the event. On the trial the general authority of O’Hare, the branch manager, to make a contract of this nature was established. The admission of defendant’s Exhibit 1 in evidence was erroneous and constituted prejudicial error. The question of fact to be determined on the new trial is whether or not the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for commissions. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur. ■

Case Details

Case Name: Hewitt v. Silent Automatic Sales Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1933
Citation: 238 A.D. 805
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.