History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re County of Westchester
237 A.D. 833
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion the learned Special Term was without power to make the order appealed from. The claimant, MacEwen, cannot, in our opinion, have the validity of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of New Rochelle determined in this proceeding. Her remedy is by the institution of an action for a declaratory judgment. (See Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221, 225.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: In re County of Westchester
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1932
Citation: 237 A.D. 833
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.