History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lindgren v. Kahn
236 A.D. 685
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion the plaintiff established prima facie the agreement alleged in the complaint. We are further of the opinion that there is nc evidence that the Claussen action was not brought by the plaintiff in good faith or that she induced the slanders complained of. The discontinuance of that action, therefore, furnished a sufficient consideration for the agreement sued upon. Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result, being of opinion that issues of fact existed which should have been submitted to the jury.

Case Details

Case Name: Lindgren v. Kahn
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1931
Citation: 236 A.D. 685
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.