History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curen v. Anderson
235 A.D. 885
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Rhodes, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the plaintiff was negligent in that there was not the required lateral light upon this truck and that it was a contributing cause of the accident.

Case Details

Case Name: Curen v. Anderson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1932
Citation: 235 A.D. 885
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.