History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curen v. Anderson
235 A.D. 885
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Rhodes, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the plaintiff was negligent in that there was not the required lateral light upon this truck and that it was a contributing cause of the accident.

Case Details

Case Name: Curen v. Anderson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1932
Citation: 235 A.D. 885
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.