History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sittig v. Schaller
233 A.D. 889
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1931
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The question submitted is answered “ Yes,” and judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Percival A. Sittig and Marie L. Sittig, against the defendants, Joseph M. Schaller and Anna M. Schaller, adjudging and decreeing that the said defendants accept the deed tendered by plaintiffs, and pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $5,700, the balance of the purchase price, without costs or disbursements of this submission. Under the authority of Luhrs v. Eimer (80 N. Y. 171) the eleven brothers and sisters of John Zimmerman, being non-resident aliens, were not capable of inheriting real property in this State. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. Submitted controversy determined in favor of the plaintiffs, without costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Sittig v. Schaller
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1931
Citation: 233 A.D. 889
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.