History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Pomerance
231 A.D. 869
N.Y. App. Div.
1930
Check Treatment

Application denied without prejudice to renewal after application to the Court of Appeals for suspension of rule II of Rules [of the Court of Appeals] for the Admission of Attorneys and Counselors-at-Law. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Pomerance
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1930
Citation: 231 A.D. 869
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.