History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jenks v. Burns
231 A.D. 864
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

Order granting con*865solidation of actions and denying motion to refer the issues in the consolidated actions affirmed, without costs. We do not hold that plaintiff in action No. 2 may not have a trial by jury of the issue therein involved even though his complaint by the consolidation order is now presented in the form of a counterclaim. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Jenks v. Burns
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1930
Citation: 231 A.D. 864
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.