History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoag v. Landau
231 A.D. 776
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground there were prejudicial errors in the ruling of the court, and that the verdict as to malice and probable cause is against *777the weight of the evidence. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Hill, JJ., concur; Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoag v. Landau
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1930
Citation: 231 A.D. 776
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.