History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dean v. Johnson
216 A.D. 773
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1926
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The record indicates that the claimant, under his contract, might have procured the work to be done by others than himself, and did in fact *774employ others to this end. As he was not required to provide his own personal services to cut the timber we think he was an independent contractor. All concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

Case Details

Case Name: Dean v. Johnson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1926
Citation: 216 A.D. 773
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.