History
  • No items yet
midpage
In the Interest of B.H.
2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 395
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2015
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM

B.H. (Father) appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to his children, B.H. and G.H. Father claims the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because the Children’s Division failed to use reasonable efforts to provide services to him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in terminating the Father’s parental rights. An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: In the Interest of B.H.
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 14, 2015
Citation: 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 395
Docket Number: No. ED 101818
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.