History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pearson v. Wilson
214 A.D. 848
N.Y. App. Div.
1925
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The order is affirmed because the motion papers fail to state what the amendments are which are sought and, therefore, it is impossible to pass upon their necessity. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Sears and Taylor, JJ. Order denying motion to amend certiorari order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to renew motion upon proper papers.

Case Details

Case Name: Pearson v. Wilson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 15, 1925
Citation: 214 A.D. 848
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.