History
  • No items yet
midpage
Colbourn v. New York Central Railroad
214 A.D. 807
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1925
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The learned trial justice granted defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is excessive. The record discloses that the plaintiff received a serious injury. Giving full effect to plaintiff’s proof, the verdict might be said to be warranted. The trial justice, however, saw and heard the witnesses including the plaintiff himself and we feel under the circumstances of this case disinclined to interfere with the discretion with which the trial justice is vested. (Boos v. Field, 192 App. Div. 696.) Order affirmed, with costs. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Sears and Crouch, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Colbourn v. New York Central Railroad
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1925
Citation: 214 A.D. 807
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.