History
  • No items yet
midpage
City of Utica v. Hanna
206 A.D. 732
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1923
|
Check Treatment

Order reversed, on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, on the ground that the plaintiff city did not incur any liability by procuring the injunction or because of its proceeding under it. (City of Yonkers v. Federal S. R. Co., 221 N. Y. 206; Herkimer Lumber Co. v. State of New York, 196 App. Div. 708.) The Special Term did not have jurisdiction to amend the injunction order and impose a liability where none had existed before the amendment. All concur; Crouch, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: City of Utica v. Hanna
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1923
Citation: 206 A.D. 732
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.