History
  • No items yet
midpage
Riegel v. Franzel
202 A.D. 778
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

Order reversed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten doEars costs. Held, that as no notice of an application for the appointment of a receiver or for an order requiring the defendant to give a bond, was served upon the defendant, the court was without jurisdiction to make the order requiring *779the defendant to give a bond, and requiring the appointment of a receiver if she failed to do so. The court had jurisdiction to make an order permitting the sale of the live stock and directing the payment of the proceeds into court. All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Riegel v. Franzel
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1922
Citation: 202 A.D. 778
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.