History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rouss v. Grossman
199 A.D. 966
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1921
|
Check Treatment

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that an issue of fact was presented which should have been submitted to the jury, as requested by defendant’s counsel at the close of the case, as to whether or not the plaintiff was the holder in due course for value of the check in question. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Rouss v. Grossman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1921
Citation: 199 A.D. 966
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.