History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fileman v. Mooney
196 A.D. 944
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1921
|
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that a cause of action was proven by the plaintiffs which should have been submitted to the jury. It was held upon the former appeal that plaintiffs might disaffirm the contract and seek to recover the sums paid on the contract. [184 App. Div. 535.] This is precisely what they sought to do. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Jayeox, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Fileman v. Mooney
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 15, 1921
Citation: 196 A.D. 944
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.