History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad
194 A.D. 894
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1920
|
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, without costs, and without passing upon the merits, for the reason that it does not appear that a temporary injunction is necessary for the preservation of the rights of the plaintiffs as claimed. Present — Clarke P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1920
Citation: 194 A.D. 894
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.