Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad
194 A.D. 894
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1920|
Check TreatmentOrder affirmed, without costs, and without passing upon the merits, for the reason that it does not appear that a temporary injunction is necessary for the preservation of the rights of the plaintiffs as claimed. Present — Clarke P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
