History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Sullivan
192 A.D. 885
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1920
|
Check Treatment

Decree and order of the Surrogate’s Court of Bongs county affirmed, with costs to the respondent. (Matter of Budlong, 126 N. Y. 423.) No opinion. Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Blackmar, J., dissents on the ground that there was no evidence of undue influence or fraud which the jury were justified in finding influenced the testamentary disposition exercised several years afterward, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Sullivan
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 15, 1920
Citation: 192 A.D. 885
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.