History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
185 A.D. 918
N.Y. App. Div.
1918
Check Treatment

All concurred, except John M. Kellogg, P. J., dissenting on the ground that the maintenance of the park was a governmental function. (Barrett v. State of New York, 220 N. Y. 423.)

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 15, 1918
Citation: 185 A.D. 918
Docket Number: Claim No. 14682
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.