History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wachtel-Schuh Horse Co. v. Hamilton Trust Co.
158 N.Y.S. 1134
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1916
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., concurred upon the ground that the finding in the action by Cyrus Rheims,*" in which the parties to this action were defendants, involving the right to the deposits with interest, and in which the rate of interest was adjudicated as being two per centum per annum, is the law of this case, and res adjudieata.

See Rheims y. Bracken-McAveney Co. (151 App. Div. 14).—[Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Wachtel-Schuh Horse Co. v. Hamilton Trust Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 15, 1916
Citation: 158 N.Y.S. 1134
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.