History
  • No items yet
midpage
Huested v. Richmond Light & Railroad
141 N.Y.S. 1124
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1913
|
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented an issue which should have been submitted to the jury. . Jenks, P. J., Thomas and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hirsehberg and Burr, JJ., voted to modify the judgment by striking out the words “ upon the merits,” and to affirm the judgment as so modified, without costs. ' ;

Case Details

Case Name: Huested v. Richmond Light & Railroad
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 15, 1913
Citation: 141 N.Y.S. 1124
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.