History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tannatt v. Haines
135 N.Y.S. 1145
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1912
|
Check Treatment

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that reversible error was committed upon the trial by receiving in evidence, first, the alleged newspaper interview with defendant; second, the subsequent transaction between the parties .as to the fourth car of apples; third, the proof in relation to the alleged statute law of the State of Washington relating to commission merchants. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented.

Case Details

Case Name: Tannatt v. Haines
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1912
Citation: 135 N.Y.S. 1145
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.