History
  • No items yet
midpage
People ex rel. Hadsell v. Tompkins
134 N.Y.S. 1142
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1912
|
Check Treatment

Order affirmed,, with costs. Smith, P. J., concurred upon the authority of People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt (186 N. Y. 383); Houghton, J., concurred on the ground that, the witness was privileged from answering the questions because they might tend to incriminate him; Kellogg, J., voted for reversal; Lyon, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: People ex rel. Hadsell v. Tompkins
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1912
Citation: 134 N.Y.S. 1142
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.