History
  • No items yet
midpage
Koewing v. Thalmann
123 N.Y.S. 750
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1910
|
Check Treatment

Appeal from a judgment entered on the 24th.day of January, 1910, dismissing the complaint at the close of the whole case, after a trial at Trial Term.

Per Curiam:

The complaint having been dismissed at the close of the testimony, the action of the court was in the nature of a nonsuit and, therefore, not upon the merits. The judgment must, therefore, be modified by striking out the words “on the merits," and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondents. *894Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Judgment modified by striking out the-words “on the merits,’’, and as modified affirmed,' with costs to respondents.

Case Details

Case Name: Koewing v. Thalmann
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1910
Citation: 123 N.Y.S. 750
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.