History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stanfield v. Town of Hamburg
137 A.D. 880
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1909
|
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with costs. Al) concurred; McLennan, P. J., upon the ground that it would not be proper'to reinstate the verdict, but is of the opinion that the question of defendant’s negli- ' geuce and-the question of the intestate’s freedom from contributory negligence ■ are questions of fact for the jury; Spring, J., on the ground that the..plaintiff failed to establish the negligence of the defendant or the intestate’s freedom from contributory negligence. '

Case Details

Case Name: Stanfield v. Town of Hamburg
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1909
Citation: 137 A.D. 880
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.