History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mersereau v. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co.
114 N.Y.S. 1137
N.Y. App. Div.
1909
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the agreement, if made, was in violation of the Interstate Commerce Act * and, therefore, not enforcible.

See 24 U. S. Stat. at Large, 379, chap. 104, § 1 et seq.; 25 id. 855, chap. 382; 33 id. 847, chap. 708. Since amd. by 34 id. 584 et seq., chap. 3591; Id. 838, Res. 47.—[Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Mersereau v. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1909
Citation: 114 N.Y.S. 1137
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.