History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leander Bacon v. United States
20-1774
| 4th Cir. | Dec 13, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Woods McLaughlin, III, LAW OFFICE OF HENRY MCLAUGHLIN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. G. Zachary Terwilliger, United States Attorney, Robert K. Coulter, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Caitlin M. Kasmar, BUCKLEY LLP, Washington, D.C.; David M. Zobel, SYKES, BOURDON, AHERN & LEVY, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leander Bacon and Iris I. Dick Bacon appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in part based on the Rooker - Feldman doctrine. [*] We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction over the complaint on this ground. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co. , 263 U.S. 413 (1923). 2

Case Details

Case Name: Leander Bacon v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 13, 2021
Docket Number: 20-1774
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.