History
  • No items yet
midpage
WILLIAM P. RAGUSA v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA
21-0689
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Nov 24, 2021
|
Check Treatment

*1 D ISTRICT C OURT O F A PPEAL O F T HE S TATE O F F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT WILLIAM P. RAGUSA, Appellant, v.

VICTORIA M. RAGUSA, Appellee.

No. 4D21-689 [November 24, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-DR-008641- XXXX-NB.

William P. Ragusa, Boynton Beach, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM . Affirmed . See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that “[w]ithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory,” and “[w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal”); Esaw v. Esaw , 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court’s decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.”). G ROSS , F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Case Details

Case Name: WILLIAM P. RAGUSA v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 24, 2021
Docket Number: 21-0689
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.