History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Melbourne Latten
19-7018
| 4th Cir. | Nov 5, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melbourne Clarence Latten, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Day Rottenborn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melbourne Clarence Latten appeals the district court’s order denying Latten’s motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Latten , No. 1:02-cr-00011-JPJ-12 (W.D. Va. June 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Melbourne Latten
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 5, 2021
Docket Number: 19-7018
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.