History
  • No items yet
midpage
Klug v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
20-722
| Fed. Cl. | Nov 4, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0722V

UNPUBLISHED MARTHA KLUG, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 5, 2021 v.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Alexa Roggenkamp, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT [1]

On June 15, 2020, Martha Klug filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. [2] (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), which meets the definition of a Table SIRVA, after receiving the influenza vaccine on November 13, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 9. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccine in the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of his SIRVA for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her injury. Id. at ¶¶ 2, 9-11. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

*2 On October 4, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent has “concluded that [P]etitioner suffered a Table SIRVA, as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “based on the current record, [P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 5.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

2

[1] Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

[2] National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

Case Details

Case Name: Klug v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Nov 4, 2021
Docket Number: 20-722
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.