History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jacobs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
20-2067
| Fed. Cl. | Oct 29, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-2067V

UNPUBLISHED Chief Special Master Corcoran PIERRETTE JACOBS, Filed: October 4, 2021 Petitioner, v.

Withdrawal of petition; Order concluding proceedings SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS

[1] On December 30, 2020, Pierrette Jacobs filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34 . [2] Petitioner alleged that she suffered injuries after receiving human papillomavirus vaccinations in July 2008. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On September 27, 2021, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b).

In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*2 s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

2

[1] Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

[2] National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.

Case Details

Case Name: Jacobs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Oct 29, 2021
Docket Number: 20-2067
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.